Robot welding workshop also needs good dust removal methods!
Publish Time: 2022-08-17 Origin: Site
Replacing manual welding with robotic welding has become a new trend in the manufacturing industry in recent years. In order to increase production capacity and reduce labor costs, many factories have spent huge sums of money to introduce robotic welding production lines. Robot welding is indeed superior to ordinary workers in terms of working hours, work efficiency, and welding accuracy, so it is sought after by most factories.
However, we, Power Space Environmental Protection, here wants to remind everyone that although welding robots are good, they will also bring some "negative" problems, which are very worthy of the factory's attention. For example, the workshop smoke pollution caused by the efficient welding of robots question.
As we all know, welding will inevitably generate smoke and dust
simultaneously.
Although robot welding is not like manual labor, it will not suffer from occupational diseases due to smoke pollution, and will not affect the welding efficiency due to heavy smoke and breathing difficulties in the workshop. But there are strict requirements for index and air pollution emission index. This also leads to the problem of smoke pollution in the robot welding workshop, which requires more attention from the factory.
At present, there are two common robot welding dust & smoke removal methods on the market:
One is in the welding workshop, one-to-one or one-to-many to build an integrally sealed or semi-sealed "partition", with a top suction or side suction air outlet, the smoke and dust generated during robot welding are collected into the main machine of the centralized welding smoke purifier, and then discharged after being purified by the filter cartridge.
One is to directly set a top suction hood or a movable top suction hood. This kind of top suction hood is generally designed with a protective soft curtain hanging around, which can be suspended on the ceiling or installed on a movable robot gantry. Compared with the previous sealed or semi-sealed "partition", this method is more economical in construction cost and more suitable for a wider range of working conditions, so it is used by most manufacturing factories.